Appraisal of Capital Market Efficiency on Economic Growth in Nigeria

International Journal of Business and Management December, 2009
219

Appraisal of Capital Market Efficiency
on Economic Growth in Nigeria

Sunday O. E. Ewah, Atim E. Esang & Jude U. Bassey
Faculty of Management Sciences, Cross River University of Technology
Ogoja Campus, Nigeria
Tel: 80-5901-4300 E-mail: soniewah@yahoo.com
Abstract
The paper is an appraisal of the impact of capital market efficiency on economic growth in Nigeria, using time series
data on market capitalization, money supply, interest rate, total market transaction and government development stock
that ranges between 1961 to 2004. The model specification for the analysis of data is multiple regression and ordinary
lest squares estimation techniques. The result of the study shows that the capital market in Nigeria has the potentials of
growth inducing, but it has not contributed meaningfully to the economic growth of Nigeria. This is as a result of low
market capitalization, low absorptive capitalization, illiquidity, misappropriation of funds among others. The empirical
test indicates that, these variables satisfied the economic apriori and are statistically significant except total transactions
and money. Thus it was concluded and recommended that, the capital market remain one of the mainstream in every
economy that has the power to influence economic growth, hence the organize private sector is encourage to invest in it.
This will enable the capital market improve its illiquidity status for economic growth and development. Therefore the
government must contribute in order to achieve these objectives through investing government securities in productive
sectors and relaxing laws that spell threat to the capital market.
Keywords: Capital market, Illiquidity, Market capitalization, Economic growth, Securities
1. Introduction
Virtually all aspects of human endeavour entail the use of money either self- generated or borrowed. Money enhances
capital accumulation with tremendous cyclical rebound on economic growth. In capital market, the stock in trade is
money which could be raised through various instruments, under well governed rules and regulations, carefully
administered and adhered to by different institutions or market operators. It is true that the rate of economic growth of
any nation is inextricably linked to the sophistication of its financial market and specifically its capital market efficiency.
Virile financial markets assist the nations of the world to muster needed financial resources and skills for growth and
development. Equity markets in developing countries until the mid-1980s generally suffered from the classical defects
of bank dominated economies that are shortage of equity capital, lack of liquidity, absence of foreign institutional
investors, and lack of investor’s confidence in the stock market (Adebiyi, 2005). Financial market and its sub-unit,
capital market are constituted when ever participants, with the aid of infrastructures, technology and other devices to
facilitate the mobilization and channeling of funds into productive investment. The importance of capital market lies in
its financial intermediation capacity to link the deficit sector with the surplus sector of the economy. The absence of
such capacity robs the economy of investment and production of goods and services for societal advancement. Funds
could thereby be idle at one end, while being sought at the other end in pursuit of socio-economic growth and
development (Akinbohungbe, 1996).
The knowledge that capital market can make a wealthy nation and wealth people is the concept and believe this paper
portrays. Universally, capital markets are primarily created to provide avenues for effective mobilization of idle funds
from surplus economic units and channeled into deficit units for long-term investment purposes. The suppliers of funds
are basically individuals and corporate bodies as government rarely supply funds to the market. The deficit units by
contrast consist only of corporate bodies and government. In other words, individuals (households) who are major
suppliers of funds to the market are absent in the category of fund users. This is because conventionally, individuals
cannot access the capital market for funds. Moreover, capital markets through secondary arms, provide opportunities for
the purchase and sale of existing securities among investors thereby encouraging the populace to invest in securities and
fostering economic growth.
The funding requirements of corporate bodies and governments are often colossal, sometimes running into billions of
naira. It is therefore, usually difficult for these bodies to meet such funding requirements solely from internal sources,
Vol. 4, No. 12 International Journal of Business and Management
220
hence they often look up to the capital market. This is because the capital market is the ideal source as it enables
corporate entities and government to pool monies from a large number of people and institutions. Thus the
socio-economic function of the capital market is well established. It does not only encourage and mobilize savings but
also efficiently allocates such savings to areas of need (Ekineh, 1996).
The Nigeria capital market is categorized into primary and secondary markets. New securities are issued in the primary
market, and companies issuing these securities receive the proceeds for the sale. The secondary market provides a
forum for the sale of securities by one investor to another investor. Thus, the efficient functioning of the market paves
way for the primary market by making investors more willing to purchase new securities in anticipation of selling such
in the secondary market. These securities are the major instrument used to raise funds at the capital market.
The institutional framework through which the capital market function in Nigeria include; the Nigerian securities and
exchange commission (NSEC), the Nigerian stock exchange (NSE), stock brokers and investors. The main objective of
establishing the Nigerian capital market is to mobilize savings from numerous economic units for economic growth and
development, provide adequate liquidity to investors, broaden the ownership base of assets as well as the creation of a
buoyant private sector, provide alternative source of funds for government, others are to encourage more efficient
allocation of new investments through the price mechanism, encourage more efficient allocation of a given amount of
tangible wealth through changes in the composition and ownership of wealth, create a built-in efficiency in the
operations and allocation in the financial system to ensure optimal utilization of resources, and promote rapid capital
formation .
In the light of the above objectives, the point of departure of this study is to evaluate the level of development and
efficiency of the Nigeria capital market and how it has impacted on Nigeria’s economic growth and development in the
face of capital market reforms. For purposes of logical sequence and presentation, the paper is divided into introduction,
development of the Nigerian capita markets, theoretical underpinning, appraisal of the capital market in Nigeria,
methodology of the study, data analysis and discussion of results, regression result and analysis, conclusion and
recommendations.
1.1 Development of the Nigeria Capital Market
The development of the Nigeria Capital Market dates back to the late 1950s when the Federal Government through its
ministry of industries set up the Barback committee to advise it on ways and mean of setting up a stock market. Prior to
independence, financial operators in Nigeria comprised mainly of foreign owned commercial banks that provided
short-term commercial trade credits for the overseas companies with offices in Nigeria (Nwankwo, 1991). Their capital
balances were invested abroad in the London stock Exchange. Thus, the Nigeria Government in an attempt to accelerate
economic growth embarked on the development of the capital market. This is to provide local opportunities for
borrowing and lending of long-term capital by the public and private sectors as well as an opportunity for foreign-based
companies to offer their shares to the local investors and provide avenues for the expatriate companies to invest surplus
funds.
Based on the report of the Barback Committee the Lagos Stock Exchange was set up in 1959. With the enactment of the
Lagos Stock Exchange Act 1961, it commenced business in June, 1961 and assumed the major activities of the stock
market by providing facilities for the public to trade in shares and stocks, maintaining fair prices through stock-jobbing
and restricting the business to its members. The Lagos stock exchange was renamed the Nigeria Stock Exchange in
1977, with the following objectives;
1) To provide facilities to the public in Nigeria for the purchase and sale of funds, stocks and shares of any kind and for
the investment of money.
2) To regulate the dealings of members interest and those of their clients.
3) To control the granting of a quotation on the stock exchange in respect of funds, stocks and shares or any company,
government, municipality local authority or other corporate body.
4) To promote, support, or propose legislative or other measures affecting the aforementioned objectives.
According to its Memorandum and Articles of Association, the Exchange is incorporated as a private non-profit
organization limited by guarantee to undertake three basic functions, which include;
1) Provide trading facilities for dealing in securities listed on it.
2) Oversee activities relating to trading in securities.
3) Enhance the flow of long-term capital into productive investment and ensuring fairness of prices at which quoted
securities are traded.
Initially trading activities commenced with two Federal Government Development Stocks, one preference share and
three domestic equities. The market grew slowly during the period with only six equities at the end of 1966 compared
International Journal of Business and Management December, 2009
221
with three in 1961. Government stocks comprised the bulk of the listing with 19 of such securities quoted on the
Exchange in 1966 compared with six at the end of 1961. (Nnanna, Englama and Odoko, 2004). Prior to 1972 when the
indigenization exercise took off, activities on the Nigeria stock exchange were low. That was true both in terms of the
value and volume of transactions. For instance, the value of transactions grew from N1.49million in 1961 to
N16.6million in 1971. Similarly, the volume of transactions grew from 334 to 634 over the same period. Though the
bulk of the transactions were in government securities, which were mainly development loan stock through which the
government raised money for the execution of its development plans. Accordingly, with the promulgation and
implementation of the Nigeria Enterprises Promotion Decree of 1972, which its principal objectives include; promoting
capital formation, savings and investment in the industrial and commercial activities of the country, the low level of
activities in the stock market increased as Nigerians gained the commanding heights of the economy.
However, following the criticisms that the Nigerian stock Exchange was not responsive to the needs of local investors,
especially indigenous businessmen who wished to raise capital for their businesses, the NSE, introduced the
Second-Tier Securities Markets (SSM) in 1985 to provide the framework for the listing of small and medium-sized
Nigeria companies on the Exchange. Six companies were listed on this segment of the stock market by 1988 and by
2002 over twenty-three companies had availed themselves of the opportunities offered by this market (Nnanna,
Englama and Odoko, 2004).
The major instruments/products available in the Nigerian capital market to date include; the industrial equities
otherwise referred to as ordinary shares; industrial loans such as debentures, unsecured zero coupons, preference
bonds/stocks, specialized project loans/infrastructural loans, government stocks/bonds, unit trust schemes, unlisted
corporate/industrial loans stock, among others. The market is currently divided in to two broad categories, namely
equities and debt markets. The former are instruments or products that confer ownership rights on the investor, while
the later are interest-bearing obligations with fixed or floating interest-rates. Refer to figure 1 in the appendix section.
2. Theoretical Underpinning
Capital market is defined as the market where medium to long-term finance can be raised (Akingbohungbe, 1996). In
another exposition, Ekezie (2002) noted that capital market is the market for dealings (i.e. lending and borrowing) in
longer-term loanable funds. Mbat (2001) described it as a forum through which long-term funds are made available by
the surplus to the deficit economic units. It must, however, be noted that although all the surplus economic units have
access to the capital market, not all the deficit economic units have the same easy access to it. The restriction on the part
of the borrowers is meant to enforce the security of the funds provided by the lenders. In order to ensure that lenders are
not subjected to undue risks, borrowers in the capital market need to satisfy certain basic requirement. It has very
profound implication for socio-economic development of any nation. Companies can finance their operations by raising
funds through issuing equity (ownership) or debenture/bond borrowed as securities. Equities have perpetual life while
bond/debenture issues are structured to mature in periods of years varying from the medium to the long-term of usually
between five and twenty-five years.
Capital market offers access to a variety of financial instruments that enable economic agents to pool, price, and
exchange risk. Through assets with attractive yields, liquidity and risk characteristics, it encourages savings in financial
form. This is very essential for government and other institutions in need of long-term funds and for suppliers of
long-term funds (Nwankwo, 1991).
Based on its importance in accelerating economic growth and development, government of most nations tends to have
keen interest in the performance of its capital market. The concern is for sustained confidence in the market and for a
strong investors protection arrangement. Nigeria Securities and Exchange Commission (NSEC) is the government
agency responsible for developing and regulating the Nigeria capital market. It was created by Act No. 71 of 1979 and
re-acted as Securities and Exchange Commission Decree No. 29 of 1988. The NSEC purses its objectives by registering
all market operators based on capital adequacy, competence and solvency as criteria.
Economic growth is generally agreed to indicate development of an economy, because it transforms a country from a
five percent saver to a fifteen percent saver. Thus, it is argued that for capital market to contribute to economic growth
and development in Nigeria, it must operate efficiently. Most often, where the market operate efficiently, confidence
will be generated in the minds of the public and investors will be willing to part with hard earned funds and invest them
in securities with the hope that in future they will recoup their investment.
The theoretical explanation on the nexus between capital market and economic growth is further expanciated using
Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) developed by Fama in 1965. According to EMH, financial markets are efficient or
prices on traded assets that have already reflected all known information and therefore are unbiased because they
represent the collective beliefs of all investors about future prospects. Previous test of the EMH have relied on
long-range dependence of equity returns (Lo, 1991).It shows that past information has been found to be useful in
improving predictive accuracy. This assertion tends to invalidate the EMH in most developing countries. Equity prices
Vol. 4, No. 12 International Journal of Business and Management
222
would tend to exhibit long memory or long range dependence, because of the narrowness of their market arising from
immature regulatory and institutional arrangement (Nagayasu, 2003 and Nyong, 2003). Note that, where the market is
highly and unreasonably speculative, investors will be discouraged from parting with their funds for fear of incurring
financial losses. In situations like the one mentioned above, has detrimental effect on economic growth of any country,
meaning investors will refuse to invest in financial assets. The implication is that companies cannot raise additional
capital for expansion. Thus, it suffices to say that efficiency of the capital market is a necessary condition for growth
and development in Nigeria.
Levine and Servos (1996) postulated a strong positive relationship between stock market development and long-run
economic growth. Further studies, showed that stock market liquidity plays vital role in the process of economic growth
(Mc Kinnon, 1973, and Bencivenga, et al, 1996). Though there are other scholars who share contrary views about the
performance of the capital market and its attendant effect on economic growth and development of nations. Emenuga
(1998) for instance believed that the stock market is illiquid and blamed the ownership structure in the Nigeria stock
market. He concluded that the stock market is small and has few listed companies, low market capitalization and low
volume of transactions. Ariyo and Adelegan (2005) contend that, the liberalization of capital market contributes to the
growth of the Nigeria capital market, yet its impact at the macro-economy is quite negligible. In another exposition,
Gabriel (2002) as enunciated by Nyong (2003) lay emphasis on the Romanian capital market and conclude that the
market is inefficient and hence it has not contributed to economic growth in Romania. Which ever school of thought,
either for or against capital market as a sine qua non for economic growth all depends on the particular situation the
nation is passing through and the prevailing economic indices/determinants. With financial liberalization, many of the
East-Asian capital markets like Singapore, Hong Kong and Bangkok have developed over time to the extent that they
are presently regarded as international centres of Asia. In contrast the past years saw comparatively little change in the
capital market of sub-Saharan Africa including Nigeria.
2.1 Appraisal of the Capital Market in Nigeria
The capital market has opened the floodgate to relatively inexpensive fund surpassing the possibility of self-financing
available to indigenous enterprises. Such funds are usually used for expansion of existing businesses or to cushion the
effect of inflation so that businesses may continue as going concerns. It also afford indigenous enterprises and
entrepreneurs the opportunity to be introduced into the economy in general through entry into the securities market.
This enables shares that haven been privately held to be offered to the general market or international market for inflow
of foreign investment. The entering of an indigenous company into the capital market enhance its prestige and
reputation, especially its products and credit worthiness in the eyes of the public as conferred upon it by the new status.
(Bayero, 1996).
The capital markets in Nigeria create a free entry and exist for investors. It is a known fact in private company that it is
not easy for an investor (shareholder) to withdraw capital invested without upsetting the company capital structure. But
for public quoted company, it does work not like that. As long as an investor’s broker can find a prospective investor to
buy the clients’ shares the process is done.
One of those important functions of the capital market is to encourage indigenous enterprises to develop its peculiar
technologies through accessibility to funds and expertise through international connection. This it has achieved
tremendously. Moreover, most of the enterprises benefited from the implementation of the Nigeria Enterprises
Promotion Acts and the privatization policies through the market. Both policies promoted indigenous enterprises, which
are the main engine of economic growth and development in an economy.
Despites the capital market laudable performance and benefits, it is still beclouded with some weakness in Nigeria. The
bureaucratic system of the Securities and Exchange Commission is a hindrance to smooth processing of application
submitted to it. The private sector to which most enterprises belong is not used to the “leap and tumble” system of the
public sector, but operates by leaps and bounds. The fee charge by the exchange are unreasonably high and constitute a
great burden on enterprises/companies for whose sake the Second tier Securities Market (SSM) was established in 1985.
If it is realized that the engine of economic growth and development in Nigeria rest in this sector, which is endowed
with the capacity to create jobs for the unemployed, then the charges should be moderate and not appear to be punitive.
Likewise the cost of hiring the services of stock brokers, registrars and issuing houses in the capital market is getting
higher every now and then, but their efficiency is not commensurate to the high cost, this gives room for complaints and
mistrust. The imposition of all forms of taxes by the three tiers of government on companies and businesses is
especially discouraging, and add to the number of weakness that undermine the capital market as the engine room and
pivot for economic growth and development in Nigeria.
3. Methodology of the Study
The objective of this study is to examine the impact of capital market efficiency on the economic growth and
development in Nigeria. The operational methodology adopted is the multiple regression analysis with Ordinary Least
International Journal of Business and Management December, 2009
223
squares (OLS) econometric techniques and a time series secondary data from 1961 to 2004, which were obtained from
various sources. The Ordinary Least Squares Theorem, supported by Koutsoyiannis (1985), Wannocott and Wonnocott
(1972) and Nyong (1993) as the Best Linear Unbiased Estimator (BLUE).
3.1 Model Specification
The efficiency of the capital market is determine by a number of factors, which include how financial assets are priced,
such as interest rates and market price for risk, transactions in buying and selling of securities (liquidity), efficient
information system, size of the stock market that is market capitalization, number of listed equities and the level of
money supply in the economy. The interrelationship of these factors ensures the efficiency of the capital market to
mobilize and allocate resources for economic growth.
The functional form on which our econometric model is based is given as;
Y = F(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5) (1)
Where Y is economic growth or GDP = dependent variables
x1 to x5 are independent variables or macro-economic factors
F represents the functional notation.
This can be specifically stated as;
ECG = F (GDS, ITR, MC, M2, TTR) (2)
Note that the proxy for economic growth (ECG) is GDP, hence it will be use for the study instead. The OLS linear
regression equation based on the above functional relation is;
Y = a0+a1x1+a2x2+a3x3+a4x4+a5x5 + U
(3)
GDP = a0 + a1GDS+a2ITR+a3MC+a4M2+a5TTR+U (4)
Where;
GDP = Gross Domestic Product (proxy for economic growth)
GDS = Government Development Stock
ITR = Interest Rate or determinant of share prices
MC = Market Capitalization
M2 = Broad Money Supply
TTR = Total Market Transaction
a = Regression Constant
U = Stochastic Error Term
Transforming equation (4) to the natural logarithm we obtain;
LogGDP=loga0+a1logGDS+a2ITR+a3logMC+a4logM2+a5TTR+U (5)
The following are apriori expectations of the coefficient of the model:= a1a2<0,a3a5>0,a4>0.
4. Data Analysis and Discussion of Results
Table 4.1 shows the market capitalization of six emerging economies. That is Nigeria, Malaysia, Indonesia, Korea,
Singapore and South Africa.
The market capitalization of Nigeria during the years under review had the highest increase of 2.7b in 1994 only to drop
to 2.0b in 1995. Malaysia had enjoyed a steady increase from 1990 to 1993 only for the figure of its market
capitalization to drop in 1994 (199.3b) and later increased in 1995 to 222.7b. Indonesia also had the same experience as
it can be seen in the table. Its figure only decrease in 1991 (6.8b), apart from that, other years showed steady increase.
The market capitalization of Korea was always oscillating during this period, yet it showed a reasonable difference
between 1990 (110.6b), and 1995 (182.0b). Singapore equally maintained a meaningful increase in its market
capitalization over the years as depicted in the table. South Africa figure only drop in 1992 (103.56b) other years before
and after 1992 showed increase in market capitalization. On the whole South Africa is the most viable in terms of
market capitalization when compared to the other five emerging economies. Nigeria had the lowest market
capitalization during the period under review when compared to the other countries.
In order to measure the size of the stock market it is necessary to use the number of listed companies. Therefore, table 2
shows the number of domestic companies listed or quoted in five different emerging stock markets.
Vol. 4, No. 12 International Journal of Business and Management
224
It can be observed that all the five economies had progressive turnover, based on the increase in the number of quoted
companies each year. A careful look at the table shows that Korea had the highest number of listed companies during
the period under review. This is followed by Malaysia, while Singapore and Indonesia take their turn. In all Nigeria had
always taken the bottom and the least when compared to other countries during the period. In 1990 (131), 1991 (142),
1992 (153), 1993 (174), 1994 (177) and in 1995 (181). Though the figures were increasing each year, but was less than
the figures for the other four countries listed in the stock market. This means that, the number of listed companies in the
capital market in Nigeria is quite few. The private sector should be encouraged to invest more on stock.
Table 4.3 shows the empirical data on which part of the analysis of this paper is based. As can be observed policy
regimes is presented in column 1, government stock column 2, industrial loans column 3, equities and SSM column 4,
and economic growth rate column 5. These are all disaggregated number of quoted securities and the total annual
growth rate of the securities for the period from 1961 to 2004, which is exactly 33 years. The analysis showed that
market reforms as contained in the policy regimes of the Indigenization Decree, 1972, the Structural Adjustment
programme (SAP), 1986, the Second tier Securities Market (SSM) and the new industrial policy impacted positively
on the growth of the capital market. Though, the rate of growth had been quite marginal. However, the policy reforms
of Nigeria Investment Promotion Commission Act, 1995 and Foreign Exchange (Miscellaneous) Decree, 1995 which
operate till 2004 did not have significant impact on the growth of the capital market as the period was characterized by
sluggish or slow growth rate. Some years had negative growth rates. Such as in 1987 (-0.54), 1997 (-4.35), 2000 (-2.99)
and 2002 (-4.98), and the average growth rate for quoted or listed securities for the period was 17.0.
4.1 Regression Result and Analysis
Table 4.4 shows the regression equation for capital market efficiency and economic growth, and the regression result.
Observation shows that the result is consistent with economic apriori expectation. The co-efficient of the constant term
is 11.9989, which is positive and statically significant. The coefficient of the log of money supply (LNMS) is negative.
This implies that the Nigerian economy has low absorptive capacity and hence cannot absorb financial capital
productively. The result confirms Ndebbio (2006) earlier assertion that Nigeria and some other under developed
countries have low absorptive capacity. The results of the log of market capitalization (LNMC) and total transactions in
the stock market (LNTTR) assume positive sign. This means that a large capital market size and with the simplicity in
buying and selling of securities, has the potential to enhance growth.
Furthermore, the coefficient of log of government development stock (LNGDS) indicates negative. This implies fund
raised by the government in capital market are sometimes spent on unproductive sector that does not enhance economic
growth. Like the case where office holders in government swindle public fund for their private use. The determinant of
share prices, interest rate (ITR) is positive from the result above. It invariables means that the Nigeria capital market
depends on the prevailing situation. For instance if interest rate is high, the demand for shares will be low and
speculative investors are likely to buy more of the shares, only to sell them when share prices are high as interest rate
falls. The profit they make in future induces economic growth.
Based on the results of the independent variables as explained by the dependent variable; it can conclusively be said that
market capitalization and interest rate have positive impact on growth while government stock retards growth. But the
three variables are statistically significant. On the other hand total transactions and money supply variables are not
statistically significant. The coefficient of multiple determinations (R2) of 0.99 or 99 percent variation in the observed
behaviour in the dependent variable is jointly explained by the independent variables. The remaining 0.01 or one
percent is captured by the stochastic error term. Thus the high R2 indicates that the model is a good fit. The F-statistics
of 432.5 indicates that it is statistically significant. A cursory examination of the Durbin-Watson (DW=1.2) statistics
result shows that the test is inconclusive, hence it can not be concluded with certainty that auto correlation exist or not.
5. Conclusion
This study reveals that there is a linkage between capital market efficiency and economic growth and development,
vis-à-vis market capitalization, money supply, total transaction in stock, government development stock and interest rate.
As it can be observed market capitalization, government development stock and interest rate are important capital
market variables that are capable of influencing economic growth in Nigeria. This is because, a large capital market
widen the prospect for growth and also government development stock if well invested and not misappropriated to
un-lucrative sector that does not have the potentials of growth inducement. Further more, interest rate acts as a function
of what happens in the capital market. Like-wise money supply and total transaction in stock are potential growth
inducing macro-economic variables that are capable of enhancing economic growth in Nigeria. But the study clearly
shows that Nigeria economy has low absorptive capacity, that is financial capital cannot be absorbed productively to
stimulate economic growth and development. Moreover, the market is characterized by illiquidity and excessive
government regulations.
International Journal of Business and Management December, 2009
225
6. Recommendations
1) The private sector should be encouraged to invest in capital market. This can be done through educating and
enlightening the public, using knowledgeable people and experts or professionals that are competent in stock market
dealings.
2) The illiquidity status of the capital market should be improved to make it more viable for investors to invest, and
such overtures can contribute to economic growth. This can be achieved through complete reversal of the ownership
structure.
3) The funds raised by government in the form of government securities in the capital market should be put into
productive sectors of the economy that will necessitate to growth in all facets of the economy.
References
Adebiyi, M.A. (2005). Capital Market Performance and The Nigerian Economic Growth. In Oluwatayo O.F. and
Olasupo, A; Issues in Money, Finance and Economic Management in Nigeria. Published by University of Lagos.
Akingbohungbe, S. S. (1996). The Role of the Financial System in the Development of the Nigerian Economy. Paper
Presented at a Workshop Organized by Centre for Africa Law and Development Studies.
Ariyo, A. and Adelegan, O. (2005). Assessing the Impact of Capital Market Reforms in Nigeria: An Incremental
Approach. Paper Presented at the46th Annual Conference of the Nigeria Economic Society (NEC) in Lagos, August.
Bayero, S. (1996). Benefits of the Capital Market to Indigenous Enterprises in Nigeria. Security Market Journal,
Special Edition, Volume Nine. Pp. 1 – 86.
Bencivenga, V. Smith, B. and Star, R. (1996). Equity Markets, Transaction Costs and Capital Accumulation: An
Illustration. World Bank Economic Review 10:241 – 265.
Ekezie, E. S. (2002). The Elements of Banking: Money, Financial Institutes and Markets. Africana – Feb Publishers
Limited. Onitsha, Nigeria.
Ekineh, S. D. (1996). The Securities and Exchange Commission and Investor Protection in the Capital Market. Security
Market Journal, Special Edition, Volume Nine, Pp. 1 – 86.
Emenuga, C. (1998). The Nigeria Capital Market and Nigeria’s Economic Performance in the Capital Market and
Nigeria’s Economic Development. Proceedings of the One-day Seminar Held at the Nigerian Institute of International
Affairs. Lagos by NES.
Fama, E. F. (1965). The Behaviour of Stock Market Prices. Journal of Business. 38 (1) 34 – 105.
Gabriel. (2002). In Nyong, M. O. (2003) Predictability and Volatility of Stock
International Finance Corporation. (1996). Emerging Stock Market Facts Book.
Koutsoyiannis, A. (1985). Theory of Econometric, Second Edition. Macmillan Press, London.
Levine, R. and Servos, S. (1996). Stock Market Development and Long-Run Growth. Policy Research Working Paper,
No. 1582. The World Bank, March.
Lo, A. W. (1991). Long Memory in Stock Market Prices. Econometrics, Vol. 59, Pp. 1279 – 1313.
Mbat, D. O. (2001). Financial Management. Domes Associates Publishers. Uyo, Nigeria First Edition.
Mckinnon, R. (1973). Money and Capital Market in Economic Development. Washington D. C.
Nagayasu, J. (2003). The Efficiency of the Japanese Equity Market, IMF Working Paper, No. 142.
Nigeria Stock Exchange (2004) Fact Book.
Nnanna, O. J; Englama, A; and Odoko, F. O. (2004). Financial Markets in Nigeria, Central Bank of Nigeria Publication.
Nwankwo, G. O. (1991). Money and Capital Markets in Nigeria Today, University of Lagos Press Nigeria.
Nyong, M. O. (2003). Predictability and Volatility of Stock Return in Three Emerging Markets: Nigeria, South Africa
and Brazil. Nigeria Journal of Economics and Development Matters 2(1): 12 – 29.
Return in Three Emerging Markets: Nigeria, South Africa and Brazil. Nigeria Journal of Economics and Development
Matters 2(1): 12 – 29.
Wannocott, R. and Wonnocott, T. H. (1972). Econometrics. John Widey and Sons New York.
Vol. 4, No. 12 International Journal of Business and Management
226
Table 4.1. Market Capitalization 1990 – 1995 (in Billion Dollars)
Country 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Nigeria 1.4 1.9 1.2 1.0 2.7 2.0
Malaysia 48.6 56.6 94.0 220.3 199.3 222.7
Indonesia 8.1 6.8 12.0 33.0 47.2 66.6
Korea 110.6 96.4 107.5 138.4 191.8 182.0
Singapore 34.3 47.6 48.8 132.7 134.5 148.0
South Africa 137.5 168.5 103.5 171.9 225.0 280.5
Sources: International Finance Corporation, 1996.
World economic and Finance Surveys “Global”
Table 4.2. Domestic companies listed in stock market
Country 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Nigeria 131 142 153 174 177 181
Malaysia 282 321 369 410 478 529
Indonesia 125 141 155 174 216 238
Korea 669 686 688 693 699 721
Singapore 150 166 163 178 240 212
Source: International Finance Corporation, 1996.
International Journal of Business and Management December, 2009
227
Table 4.3. The Number of Quoted Securities in the Nigeria Capital Market and their Growth Rate (1961 – 2004)
Policy Regimes Year Government
Stock
Industrial
Loans
Equity
Including
(SSM)
Total Growth
Rate
Pre Indigenization
(1961-1971)
1961 6 0 3 9
1965 17 5 6 28 211.1
1971 32 6 14 52 85.7
Indigenization Decree
(1972-1988)
1973 38 8 25 71 36.5
1978 49 11 42 102 43.7
1980 54 12 91 157 53.0
1981 56 14 93 163 3.82
1982 57 18 93 168 2.07
1983 61 25 92 178 5.95
1984 56 27 92 175 1.69
1985 57 28 96 181 3.43
SAP Era (1986)
SSM Era (1986)
1986 58 29 99 186 2.76
1987 54 31 100 185 -0.54
1988 51 35 102 188 1.62
The New Industrial
Policy (1989-1994)
1989 47 40 111 198 5.32
1990 43 43 131 217 9.6
1991 40 57 142 239 10.14
1992 36 62 153 251 5.02
1993 37 71 174 272 8.37
1994 35 64 177 276 1.47
Nigeria Investment
Promotion Commission
Act (1995). Foreign
Exchange
(Miscellaneous) Decree
(1995)
1995 28 67 181 276 0.0
1996 24 69 183 276 0.0
1997 22 60 182 264 -4.35
1998 19 59 186 264 0.0
1999 15 58 195 268 1.52
2000 12 53 195 260 -2.99
2001 11 56 194 261 0.38
2002 10 53 195 248 -4.98
2003 9 56 200 265 6.9
2004 12 58 207 277 4.5
Average
1961-2004
17.0
Note: From 1961 – 1979, selected years were used, while from 1980 to 2004 all the years were included.
* SSM = Second Tier Securities Market
Sources: Nigerian Stock Exchange Fact Book, 2004.
Annual Reports and Accounts of various issues.
Vol. 4, No. 12 International Journal of Business and Management
228
Table 4.4. Estimates of Capital Market Efficiency and Economic Growth (variables: LNGDP)
Variables Estimated Co-efficient T-Statistics
C 11.9989 10.32085
LNM2 -0.182107 -1.577428
LNMC 0.514899 8.031631
LNGDS -0.999489 -7.050558
LNTTR 0.019242 0.342325
ITR 0.102956 6.944213
Adjusted R2 0.986288
F-Statistics 4325742
Durbin-Watson 1.203013
Figure 1. Instruments of the Nigerian Capital Market
Source: Nnanna, Englama and Odoko, 2004.
Products of Nigerian Capital
Market
Bond Market Equities Market
Ordinary Shares Preferences Shares
Government
Stock/Bond
Mortgage Loan
Unit Trust Scheme Industrial Loans (Debentures)
Stocks/Corporate Bonds
Unquoted
Securities